This generates `lzbt-systemd` binary instead of `lzbt`
which is using a special systemd-specific entrypoint.
This is part of the effort to enable multiple backends.
Bootspec has a mechanism called synthesis where you can synthesize
bootspecs if they are not present based on the generation link only.
This is useful for "vanilla bootspec" which does not contain any
extensions, as this is what we do right now.
If we need extensions, we can also implement our synthesis mechanism on
the top of it.
Enabling synthesis gives us the superpower to support non-bootspec
users. :-)
The message about malformed generatiosn should semantically be a
warning. However, since users might have hundres of old and thus
malformed generations and can do little about it, this should remain a
debug message. This way the user is not spammed with no-op warnings
while still enabling debugging.
lzbt currently happily nukes all boot entries, if it can't parse any
bootspecs. With the upcoming incompatible bootspec change, this might
be a problem that's worth avoiding. :)
I changed lzbt to fail hard in case, it can't generate any boot
items.
Due to the use of hash maps, the order of file installation was not
deterministic. I've changed the code the use BTreeMaps instead, which
makes this deterministic. While I was here, I tried to simplify the
code a bit.
To minimize writes to the ESP but still find necessary changes, compare
the hashes of the files on the ESP with the "expected" hashes. Only copy
and overwrite already existing files if the hashes don't match. This
ensures a working-as-expected state on the ESP as opposed to previously
where already existing files were just ignored.
Previously, generations were installed one after another. Now all
artifacts (kernels, initrd etc.) are first collected and then installed.
This way the writes to the ESP are reduced as duplicate paths are
already removed in the collection phase.
Using random names for tempfiles makes handling them easier. It reduces
the amount of noise in the code because no custom name needs to be
provided for each tempfile. The names were not really useful in any
case.
It also does not burden the developer with ensuring uniqueness of names.
This is relevant when files for multiple generations need to be stored
in the same directory (e.g. because they need to be accessed after
handling one generation).
Out of an abundance of caution, 32 random alphanumeric characters are
chosen for each filename. The tempfile crate, in comparison, only
chooses 8. 32 characters should be enough to avoid collisions, even
if the PRNG is not of cryptographic quality.
Raito Bezarius