nix.tests: clean up
The test attributes and names are simplified and standardized. They now roughly follow the same structure as the systemd-boot test in Nixpkgs. Some comments are added and variable names changed to make it more clear what they actually do.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0ca25a9bf0
commit
fd2e7f7a40
|
@ -31,9 +31,13 @@ let
|
|||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
# Execute a boot test that is intended to fail.
|
||||
# Execute a SB test that is expected to fail because of a hash mismatch.
|
||||
#
|
||||
mkUnsignedTest = { name, path, appendCrap ? false }: mkSecureBootTest {
|
||||
# Takes a set `path` consisting of a `src` and a `dst` attribute. The file at
|
||||
# `src` is copied to `dst` inside th VM. Optionally append some random data
|
||||
# ("crap") to the end of the file at `dst`. This is useful to easily change
|
||||
# the hash of a file and produce a hash mismatch when booting the stub.
|
||||
mkHashMismatchTest = { name, path, appendCrap ? false }: mkSecureBootTest {
|
||||
inherit name;
|
||||
testScript = ''
|
||||
import json
|
||||
|
@ -65,16 +69,16 @@ in
|
|||
{
|
||||
# TODO: user mode: OK
|
||||
# TODO: how to get in: {deployed, audited} mode ?
|
||||
lanzaboote-boot = mkSecureBootTest {
|
||||
name = "signed-files-boot-under-secureboot";
|
||||
basic = mkSecureBootTest {
|
||||
name = "lanzaboote";
|
||||
testScript = ''
|
||||
machine.start()
|
||||
assert "Secure Boot: enabled (user)" in machine.succeed("bootctl status")
|
||||
'';
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
lanzaboote-boot-under-sd-stage1 = mkSecureBootTest {
|
||||
name = "signed-files-boot-under-secureboot-systemd-stage-1";
|
||||
systemd-initrd = mkSecureBootTest {
|
||||
name = "lanzaboote-systemd-initrd";
|
||||
machine = { ... }: {
|
||||
boot.initrd.systemd.enable = true;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
@ -84,15 +88,12 @@ in
|
|||
'';
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
# So, this is the responsibility of the lanzatool install
|
||||
# to run the append-initrd-secret script
|
||||
# This test assert that lanzatool still do the right thing
|
||||
# preDeviceCommands should not have any root filesystem mounted
|
||||
# so it should not be able to find /etc/iamasecret, other than the
|
||||
# initrd's one.
|
||||
# which should exist IF lanzatool do the right thing.
|
||||
lanzaboote-with-initrd-secrets = mkSecureBootTest {
|
||||
name = "signed-files-boot-with-secrets-under-secureboot";
|
||||
# Test that a secret is appended to the initrd during installation.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# During the execution of `preDeviceCommands`, no filesystem should be
|
||||
# mounted. The only place to find `/etc/iamasecret` then, is in the initrd.
|
||||
initrd-secrets = mkSecureBootTest {
|
||||
name = "lanzaboote-initrd-secrets";
|
||||
machine = { ... }: {
|
||||
boot.initrd.secrets = {
|
||||
"/etc/iamasecret" = (pkgs.writeText "iamsecret" "this is a very secure secret");
|
||||
|
@ -109,12 +110,12 @@ in
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
# The initrd is not directly signed. Its hash is embedded
|
||||
# into lanzaboote. To make integrity verification fail, we
|
||||
# into the UKI. To make integrity verification fail, we
|
||||
# actually have to modify the initrd. Appending crap to the
|
||||
# end is a harmless way that would make the kernel still
|
||||
# accept it.
|
||||
is-initrd-secured = mkUnsignedTest {
|
||||
name = "unsigned-initrd-do-not-boot-under-secureboot";
|
||||
secured-initrd = mkHashMismatchTest {
|
||||
name = "lanzaboote-secured-initrd";
|
||||
path = {
|
||||
src = "bootspec.get('initrd')";
|
||||
dst = "convert_to_esp(bootspec.get('initrd'))";
|
||||
|
@ -122,15 +123,16 @@ in
|
|||
appendCrap = true;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
is-kernel-secured = mkUnsignedTest {
|
||||
name = "unsigned-kernel-do-not-boot-under-secureboot";
|
||||
secured-kernel = mkHashMismatchTest {
|
||||
name = "lanzaboote-secured-kernel";
|
||||
path = {
|
||||
src = "bootspec.get('kernel')";
|
||||
dst = "convert_to_esp(bootspec.get('kernel'))";
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
specialisation-works = mkSecureBootTest {
|
||||
name = "specialisation-still-boot-under-secureboot";
|
||||
|
||||
specialisation = mkSecureBootTest {
|
||||
name = "lanzaboote-specialisation";
|
||||
machine = { pkgs, ... }: {
|
||||
specialisation.variant.configuration = {
|
||||
environment.systemPackages = [
|
||||
|
@ -141,7 +143,6 @@ in
|
|||
testScript = ''
|
||||
machine.start()
|
||||
print(machine.succeed("ls -lah /boot/EFI/Linux"))
|
||||
print(machine.succeed("cat /run/current-system/boot.json"))
|
||||
# TODO: make it more reliable to find this filename, i.e. read it from somewhere?
|
||||
machine.succeed("bootctl set-default nixos-generation-1-specialisation-variant.efi")
|
||||
machine.succeed("sync")
|
||||
|
@ -149,7 +150,7 @@ in
|
|||
machine.crash()
|
||||
machine.start()
|
||||
print(machine.succeed("bootctl"))
|
||||
# We have efibootmgr in this specialisation.
|
||||
# Only the specialisation contains the efibootmgr binary.
|
||||
machine.succeed("efibootmgr")
|
||||
'';
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue