min
/
lanzaboote
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #232 from alois31/insecure-boot 

stub: improve handling of insecure boot
This commit is contained in:
Julian Stecklina 2023-10-16 08:29:25 +00:00 committed by GitHub
parent 82530e530b 01b62a1c21
commit 0df60a2b2e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
6 changed files with 122 additions and 115 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
nix/tests/lanzaboote.nix
View File

@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ let
machine.crash()
machine.start()
'' + (if useSecureBoot then ''
machine.wait_for_console_text("Hash mismatch")
machine.wait_for_console_text("hash does not match")
'' else ''
# Just check that the system came up.
print(machine.succeed("bootctl", timeout=120))

6
rust/uefi/linux-bootloader/src/pe_loader.rs
View File

@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ use uefi::{
boot::{AllocateType, MemoryType},
Boot, SystemTable,
},
CStr16, Handle, Status,
Handle, Status,
};
/// UEFI mandates 4 KiB pages.
@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ impl Image {
self,
handle: Handle,
system_table: &SystemTable<Boot>,
load_options: &CStr16,
load_options: &[u8],
) -> Status {
let mut loaded_image = system_table
.boot_services()
@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ impl Image {
);
loaded_image.set_load_options(
load_options.as_ptr() as *const u8,
u32::try_from(load_options.num_bytes()).unwrap(),
u32::try_from(load_options.len()).unwrap(),
);
}

72
rust/uefi/stub/src/common.rs
View File

@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
use alloc::vec::Vec;
use uefi::{prelude::*, CStr16, CString16, Result};
use log::warn;
use uefi::{
guid, prelude::*, proto::loaded_image::LoadedImage, table::runtime::VariableVendor, CStr16,
CString16, Result,
};
use linux_bootloader::linux_loader::InitrdLoader;
use linux_bootloader::pe_loader::Image;
@ -12,6 +16,70 @@ pub fn extract_string(pe_data: &[u8], section: &str) -> Result<CString16> {
Ok(CString16::try_from(string.as_str()).map_err(|_| Status::INVALID_PARAMETER)?)
}
/// Obtain the kernel command line that should be used for booting.
///
/// If Secure Boot is active, this is always the embedded one (since the one passed from the bootloader may come from a malicious type 1 entry).
/// If Secure Boot is not active, the command line passed from the bootloader is used, falling back to the embedded one.
pub fn get_cmdline(
embedded: &CStr16,
boot_services: &BootServices,
secure_boot_enabled: bool,
) -> Vec<u8> {
if secure_boot_enabled {
// The command line passed from the bootloader cannot be trusted, so it is not used when Secure Boot is active.
embedded.as_bytes().to_vec()
} else {
let passed = boot_services
.open_protocol_exclusive::<LoadedImage>(boot_services.image_handle())
.map(|loaded_image| loaded_image.load_options_as_bytes().map(|b| b.to_vec()));
match passed {
Ok(Some(passed)) => passed,
// If anything went wrong, fall back to the embedded command line.
_ => embedded.as_bytes().to_vec(),
}
}
}
/// Check whether Secure Boot is active, and we should be enforcing integrity checks.
///
/// In case of doubt, true is returned to be on the safe side.
pub fn get_secure_boot_status(runtime_services: &RuntimeServices) -> bool {
// The firmware initialized SecureBoot to 1 if performing signature checks, and 0 if it doesn't.
// Applications are not supposed to modify this variable (in particular, don't change the value from 1 to 0).
let secure_boot_enabled = runtime_services
.get_variable(
cstr16!("SecureBoot"),
&VariableVendor(guid!("8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c")),
&mut [1],
)
.and_then(|(value, _)| match value {
[0] => Ok(false),
[1] => Ok(true),
[v] => {
warn!(
"Unexpected value of SecureBoot variable: {v}. Performing verification anyway."
);
Ok(true)
}
_ => Err(Status::BAD_BUFFER_SIZE.into()),
})
.unwrap_or_else(|err| {
if err.status() == Status::NOT_FOUND {
warn!("SecureBoot variable not found. Assuming Secure Boot is not supported.");
false
} else {
warn!("Failed to read SecureBoot variable: {err}. Performing verification anyway.");
true
}
});
if !secure_boot_enabled {
warn!("Secure Boot is not active!");
}
secure_boot_enabled
}
/// Boot the Linux kernel without checking the PE signature.
///
/// We assume that the caller has made sure that the image is safe to
@ -20,7 +88,7 @@ pub fn boot_linux_unchecked(
handle: Handle,
system_table: SystemTable<Boot>,
kernel_data: Vec<u8>,
kernel_cmdline: &CStr16,
kernel_cmdline: &[u8],
initrd_data: Vec<u8>,
) -> uefi::Result<()> {
let kernel =

16
rust/uefi/stub/src/fat.rs
View File

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
use alloc::vec::Vec;
use uefi::{prelude::*, CString16, Result};
use crate::common::{boot_linux_unchecked, extract_string};
use crate::common::{boot_linux_unchecked, extract_string, get_cmdline, get_secure_boot_status};
use linux_bootloader::pe_section::pe_section;
use linux_bootloader::uefi_helpers::booted_image_file;
@ -56,12 +56,12 @@ pub fn boot_linux(handle: Handle, mut system_table: SystemTable<Boot>) -> Status
.expect("Failed to extract configuration from binary.")
};
boot_linux_unchecked(
handle,
system_table,
config.kernel,
let secure_boot_enabled = get_secure_boot_status(system_table.runtime_services());
let cmdline = get_cmdline(
&config.cmdline,
config.initrd,
)
.status()
system_table.boot_services(),
secure_boot_enabled,
);
boot_linux_unchecked(handle, system_table, config.kernel, &cmdline, config.initrd).status()
}

2
rust/uefi/stub/src/main.rs
View File

@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ fn main(handle: Handle, mut system_table: SystemTable<Boot>) -> Status {
#[cfg(feature = "thin")]
{
status = thin::boot_linux(handle, system_table)
status = thin::boot_linux(handle, system_table).status()
}
status

137
rust/uefi/stub/src/thin.rs
View File

@ -1,12 +1,10 @@
use alloc::vec::Vec;
use log::warn;
use log::{error, warn};
use sha2::{Digest, Sha256};
use uefi::fs::FileSystem;
use uefi::{prelude::*, proto::loaded_image::LoadedImage, CStr16, CString16, Result};
use uefi::{fs::FileSystem, prelude::*, CString16, Result};
use crate::common::{boot_linux_unchecked, extract_string};
use crate::common::{boot_linux_unchecked, extract_string, get_cmdline, get_secure_boot_status};
use linux_bootloader::pe_section::pe_section;
use linux_bootloader::{linux_loader::InitrdLoader, uefi_helpers::booted_image_file};
use linux_bootloader::uefi_helpers::booted_image_file;
type Hash = sha2::digest::Output<Sha256>;
@ -59,53 +57,25 @@ impl EmbeddedConfiguration {
}
}
/// Boot the Linux kernel via the UEFI PE loader.
/// Verify some data against its expected hash.
///
/// This should only succeed when UEFI Secure Boot is off (or
/// broken...), because the Lanzaboote tool does not sign the kernel.
///
/// In essence, we can use this routine to detect whether Secure Boot
/// is actually enabled.
fn boot_linux_uefi(
handle: Handle,
system_table: SystemTable<Boot>,
kernel_data: Vec<u8>,
kernel_cmdline: &CStr16,
initrd_data: Vec<u8>,
) -> uefi::Result<()> {
let kernel_handle = system_table.boot_services().load_image(
handle,
uefi::table::boot::LoadImageSource::FromBuffer {
buffer: &kernel_data,
file_path: None,
},
)?;
let mut kernel_image = system_table
.boot_services()
.open_protocol_exclusive::<LoadedImage>(kernel_handle)?;
unsafe {
kernel_image.set_load_options(
kernel_cmdline.as_ptr() as *const u8,
// This unwrap is "safe" in the sense that any
// command-line that doesn't fit 4G is surely broken.
u32::try_from(kernel_cmdline.num_bytes()).unwrap(),
);
/// In case of a mismatch:
/// * If Secure Boot is active, an error message is logged, and the SECURITY_VIOLATION error is returned to stop the boot.
/// * If Secure Boot is not active, only a warning is logged, and the boot process is allowed to continue.
fn check_hash(data: &[u8], expected_hash: Hash, name: &str, secure_boot: bool) -> uefi::Result<()> {
let hash_correct = Sha256::digest(data) == expected_hash;
if !hash_correct {
if secure_boot {
error!("{name} hash does not match!");
return Err(Status::SECURITY_VIOLATION.into());
} else {
warn!("{name} hash does not match! Continuing anyway.");
}
let mut initrd_loader = InitrdLoader::new(system_table.boot_services(), handle, initrd_data)?;
let status = system_table
.boot_services()
.start_image(kernel_handle)
.status();
initrd_loader.uninstall(system_table.boot_services())?;
status.to_result()
}
Ok(())
}
pub fn boot_linux(handle: Handle, mut system_table: SystemTable<Boot>) -> Status {
pub fn boot_linux(handle: Handle, mut system_table: SystemTable<Boot>) -> uefi::Result<()> {
uefi_services::init(&mut system_table).unwrap();
// SAFETY: We get a slice that represents our currently running
@ -121,6 +91,8 @@ pub fn boot_linux(handle: Handle, mut system_table: SystemTable<Boot>) -> Status
.expect("Failed to extract configuration from binary. Did you run lzbt?")
};
let secure_boot_enabled = get_secure_boot_status(system_table.runtime_services());
let kernel_data;
let initrd_data;
@ -139,57 +111,24 @@ pub fn boot_linux(handle: Handle, mut system_table: SystemTable<Boot>) -> Status
.expect("Failed to read initrd file into memory");
}
let is_kernel_hash_correct = Sha256::digest(&kernel_data) == config.kernel_hash;
let is_initrd_hash_correct = Sha256::digest(&initrd_data) == config.initrd_hash;
if !is_kernel_hash_correct {
warn!("Hash mismatch for kernel!");
}
if !is_initrd_hash_correct {
warn!("Hash mismatch for initrd!");
}
if is_kernel_hash_correct && is_initrd_hash_correct {
boot_linux_unchecked(
handle,
system_table,
kernel_data,
let cmdline = get_cmdline(
&config.cmdline,
initrd_data,
)
.status()
} else {
// There is no good way to detect whether Secure Boot is
// enabled. This is unfortunate, because we want to give the
// user a way to recover from hash mismatches when Secure Boot
// is off.
//
// So in case we get a hash mismatch, we will try to load the
// Linux image using LoadImage. What happens then depends on
// whether Secure Boot is enabled:
//
// **With Secure Boot**, the firmware will reject loading the
// image with status::SECURITY_VIOLATION.
//
// **Without Secure Boot**, the firmware will just load the
// Linux kernel.
//
// This is the behavior we want. A slight turd is that we
// increase the attack surface here by exposing the unverfied
// Linux image to the UEFI firmware. But in case the PE loader
// of the firmware is broken, we have little hope of security
// anyway.
system_table.boot_services(),
secure_boot_enabled,
);
warn!("Trying to continue as non-Secure Boot. This will fail when Secure Boot is enabled.");
check_hash(
&kernel_data,
config.kernel_hash,
"Kernel",
secure_boot_enabled,
)?;
check_hash(
&initrd_data,
config.initrd_hash,
"Initrd",
secure_boot_enabled,
)?;
boot_linux_uefi(
handle,
system_table,
kernel_data,
&config.cmdline,
initrd_data,
)
.status()
}
boot_linux_unchecked(handle, system_table, kernel_data, &cmdline, initrd_data)
}